Archive for Response to Panaorma

Scientology – Follow-Up

Part 1 of this series had a very quick comment, which in the spirit of discussion and positive debate is most welcomed.

As some of you may ‘miss’ the comment thread on the article, and in fairness to promote further consideration, I will post the link the commentator offered here as a clip.

I find it interesting that of all of the posts on this site over the months the one entitled Scientology Part 1 received, within a few short moments a comment. Would all of the topics on this site engage so immediately.

My only request for all who want to engage in debate. I may not publish comments that serve only to attack an individual rather than the argument they are putting forward. Ad Homenim Attacks are the worst kind of logical fallacy and halt any considered debate. The only value in publishing such personal attacks in any forum is to show those who use them up for their lack of intellectual integrity and ability.

So here then, is the Church of Scientology’s response to the Panorama programme. You can judge by its tone, factual content and response to questions raised by Panorama its value.